All public tools

Public municipal finance tools

Property Tax Revenue Forecaster

Explain the drivers behind a property-tax revenue scenario. This general planning model separates value growth, additions, reductions, millage, and collections; it does not apply a state-specific tax formula.

No account required. Start with an editable sample.

Reviewed · Editorial responsibility: Aurelius Civic

Inputs

Sample: USD 1 billion starting value, 10 mills, 98% collections. Edit the example to explore your own scenario.

Required label. Assessed value is used directly as a taxable proxy; no assessment-ratio conversion is inferred. Avoid double-counting reductions already excluded.

Optional additive changes to millage, collection percentage points, and annual reductions, starting in Year 1.

Editable alternative drivers start from the same Year 0. Scenarios are assumptions, not predictions.

Base year

Year 0 gross value before the separate modeled reductions below. USD. Allowed range: 0–1000000000000 USD.

Exemptions, abatements, or other value reductions not already excluded. This annual amount is deducted again from each projected gross base. Allowed range: 0–1000000000000 USD.

1 mill means USD 1 levy per USD 1000 of net value. Decimal rate = millage ÷ 1000; 10 mills = 1%. Allowed range: 0–1000 mills.

Share of gross levy collected as cash, from 0% to 100%. Allowed range: 0–100 %.

Forecast period

Whole projected years after Year 0, from 1 to 10. Allowed range: 1–10 years.

Baseline drivers

Compounds prior-year adjusted net value before new construction and annual reductions. Allowed range: -100–100 % per year.

Fixed gross value added every year after growth; additions join the adjusted base for future growth. Allowed range: 0–1000000000000 USD per year.

Baseline annual changes

Additive mills per year, starting before Year 1 levy. Every projected rate must stay between 0 and 1000. Allowed range: -1000–1000 mills per year.

Additive percentage points per year, starting in Year 1. Every projected collection must remain 0–100%. Allowed range: -100–100 percentage points per year.

Additive change to the recurring annual reduction amount. No negative reductions or net values are permitted. Allowed range: -1000000000000–1000000000000 USD per year.

Alternative drivers

Independent growth assumption; same Year 0 starting values. Allowed range: -100–100 % per year.

Independent fixed annual new value additions. Allowed range: 0–1000000000000 USD per year.

Additive mills per year from the shared base-year millage. Allowed range: -1000–1000 mills per year.

Additive percentage points per year from the shared base-year collection rate. Allowed range: -100–100 percentage points per year.

Additive USD change per year from the shared base-year annual reductions. Allowed range: -1000000000000–1000000000000 USD per year.

Browser-only calculations. Entered financial values and labels stay on this page while it is open. They are not saved, sent to our servers, included in analytics, or added to the URL. Reset restores the sample.

Results

Baseline projected cash revenue in Year 5

$11,557,946.37

Base-year cash revenue
$9,702,000.00
Baseline revenue change from Year 0
$1,855,946.37
Baseline final net taxable value
$1,117,519,591.15
Baseline final gross levy
$11,733,955.71
Baseline final collection rate
98.50%
Alternative final cash revenue
$10,063,358.59

Interpretation

General planning model. Entered terminology is preserved; assessed value is used as a taxable proxy without an inferred conversion. No state caps, rollback rules, or legal compliance tests are applied. Each scenario uses visible assumptions and is not a prediction. Review the annual data and ordered driver attribution.

Property-tax scenarios and drivers

Selected starting terminology: Taxable value before modeled reductions. 1 mill = USD 1 per USD 1000; decimal rate = millage ÷ 1000. This is a general planning model.

Annual value, levy, collections, and revenue

Separate axes preserve each measure’s units. Baseline: solid line with circles. Alternative: dashed line with squares. Year 0 and every projected point match the tables below.

Net taxable value by forecast yearBaseline is solid with circles; alternative is dashed with squares. Accessible annual tables provide identical numeric values.Net taxable value (USD)0614.6M1.2BYear 0Year 5
Gross levy by forecast yearBaseline is solid with circles; alternative is dashed with squares. Accessible annual tables provide identical numeric values.Gross levy (USD)06.5M12.9MYear 0Year 5
Collection rate by forecast yearBaseline is solid with circles; alternative is dashed with squares. Accessible annual tables provide identical numeric values.Collection rate (%)054.2108.4Year 0Year 5
Projected cash revenue by forecast yearBaseline is solid with circles; alternative is dashed with squares. Accessible annual tables provide identical numeric values.Projected cash revenue (USD)06.4M12.7MYear 0Year 5

Baseline assumptions and annual data

Existing-base growth 2% annually; new additions $15,000,000.00 annually; millage change 0.1 mills per year; collection change 0.1 percentage points per year; annual reductions change $100,000.00 per year. Annual reductions are reapplied to each year’s gross value; the prior adjusted net base carries forward.

Year 0 and 5 projected years. Nominal USD; unrounded calculations, two-decimal display.
YearGross valueReductionsNet taxable valueMillageGross levyCollection rateCash revenue
Year 0$1,000,000,000.00$10,000,000.00$990,000,000.0010.00$9,900,000.0098.00%$9,702,000.00
Year 1$1,024,800,000.00$10,100,000.00$1,014,700,000.0010.10$10,248,470.0098.10%$10,053,749.07
Year 2$1,049,994,000.00$10,200,000.00$1,039,794,000.0010.20$10,605,898.8098.20%$10,414,992.62
Year 3$1,075,589,880.00$10,300,000.00$1,065,289,880.0010.30$10,972,485.7698.30%$10,785,953.51
Year 4$1,101,595,677.60$10,400,000.00$1,091,195,677.6010.40$11,348,435.0598.40%$11,166,860.09
Year 5$1,128,019,591.15$10,500,000.00$1,117,519,591.1510.50$11,733,955.7198.50%$11,557,946.37

Baseline driver attribution: Year 0 to Year 5

The sum of ordered annual bridges reconciles to the final revenue change. Growth, additions, and reductions use the prior rate and collection. Rate effects use the new net base; collection effects use the new base and rate. Interaction effects are assigned to later steps, so another ordering would change the allocations.

Existing-base growth
$1,042,471.11
New additions
$751,245.00
Annual reductions
-$515,963.30
Rate changes
$523,284.32
Collection changes
$54,909.25
Total change from base-year cash revenue
$1,855,946.37

Alternative assumptions and annual data

Existing-base growth 1% annually; new additions $10,000,000.00 annually; millage change 0 mills per year; collection change -0.2 percentage points per year; annual reductions change $200,000.00 per year. Annual reductions are reapplied to each year’s gross value; the prior adjusted net base carries forward.

Year 0 and 5 projected years. Nominal USD; unrounded calculations, two-decimal display.
YearGross valueReductionsNet taxable valueMillageGross levyCollection rateCash revenue
Year 0$1,000,000,000.00$10,000,000.00$990,000,000.0010.00$9,900,000.0098.00%$9,702,000.00
Year 1$1,009,900,000.00$10,200,000.00$999,700,000.0010.00$9,997,000.0097.80%$9,777,066.00
Year 2$1,019,697,000.00$10,400,000.00$1,009,297,000.0010.00$10,092,970.0097.60%$9,850,738.72
Year 3$1,029,389,970.00$10,600,000.00$1,018,789,970.0010.00$10,187,899.7097.40%$9,923,014.31
Year 4$1,038,977,869.70$10,800,000.00$1,028,177,869.7010.00$10,281,778.7097.20%$9,993,888.89
Year 5$1,048,459,648.40$11,000,000.00$1,037,459,648.4010.00$10,374,596.4897.00%$10,063,358.59

Alternative driver attribution: Year 0 to Year 5

The sum of ordered annual bridges reconciles to the final revenue change. Growth, additions, and reductions use the prior rate and collection. Rate effects use the new net base; collection effects use the new base and rate. Interaction effects are assigned to later steps, so another ordering would change the allocations.

Existing-base growth
$492,467.08
New additions
$488,000.00
Annual reductions
-$517,240.00
Rate changes
$0.00
Collection changes
-$101,868.49
Total change from base-year cash revenue
$361,358.59

Methodology

Terminology and rate conversion

Choose taxable value before modeled reductions or assessed value used as a taxable proxy. Assessed value is used directly; no assessment ratio, equalization factor, market-value conversion, or legal taxable-base definition is inferred. Enter only reductions not already excluded from the starting value to avoid double counting. The selected label stays visible with results.

Rates are entered in mills: 1 mill means USD 1 of levy per USD 1000 of net taxable value. Decimal rate = millage ÷ 1000. Thus 10 mills = 0.01 = 1%, not 10%. All annual changes to millage are additive mills, while collection changes are additive percentage points.

Annual projection formulas

  • Year 0 net taxable value = starting entered value − base-year reductions.
  • Projected gross value = prior-year adjusted net value × (1 + existing-base growth ÷ 100) + annual additions.
  • Annual reductions in Year y = base-year reductions + y × annual reductions change.
  • Net taxable value = projected gross value − that year’s reductions.
  • Millage in Year y = base-year millage + y × annual millage change.
  • Collection in Year y = base-year collection + y × annual percentage-point change.
  • Gross levy = net taxable value × millage ÷ 1000.
  • Projected cash revenue = gross levy × collection ÷ 100.

Growth and all selected annual changes apply before Year 1. Additions enter after growth and join the adjusted net base for subsequent growth. Reductions are recurring annual deductions from each projected gross base, not a single one-time exemption. The prior adjusted base carries forward: this convention may differ from a local assessment roll. A constant annual reduction therefore reduces the base again each year. Review whether that convention fits the intended scenario.

Baseline changes may be turned off, holding millage, collection, and annual reductions constant. The optional alternative has five independently editable drivers and starts from the same Year 0 value, reductions, millage, and collection. Its changes remain independent of the baseline toggle. Neither scenario is a prediction or confidence interval.

Driver reconciliation

Each annual bridge applies five changes in order: growth, additions, reductions, rate, then collection. Growth, additions, and reductions are valued at the previous year’s rate and collection; rate effects use the new adjusted base and prior collection; collection effects use the new base and rate. These ordered effects sum to that year’s cash-revenue change. Summing annual effects gives the final change from Year 0. Interaction effects belong to the later step in this order; the allocation is not unique or a causal claim. Display rounding can create cent-level differences when adding displayed components.

Worked example

The sample starts with USD 1,000,000,000 entered taxable value, USD 10,000,000 reductions, 10 mills, and 98% collection. Year 0 net value is USD 990,000,000, levy USD 9,900,000, and cash revenue USD 9,702,000.

Baseline existing-base growth is 2%, additions USD 15,000,000 annually, millage change +0.1 per year, collection change +0.1 percentage points, and reductions change +USD 100,000 annually. Year 1 gross value is USD 1,024,800,000; reductions USD 10,100,000; net value USD 1,014,700,000. At 10.1 mills and 98.1% collection, levy is USD 10,248,470 and cash revenue USD 10,053,749.07. The USD 351,749.07 revenue change reconciles to growth USD 194,040 + additions USD 147,000 − reductions USD 98,980 + rate USD 99,440.60 + collection USD 10,248.47.

The five-year alternative uses 1% growth, USD 10,000,000 additions annually, unchanged millage, −0.2 percentage-point collection change, and +USD 200,000 annual reductions change. Year 5 cash revenue is USD 11,557,946.37 for baseline and USD 10,063,358.59 for alternative. All assumptions are editable. Reset and Load sample restore every field and mode.

Bounds and sources

Starting value, initial reductions, and additions range from zero to USD 1 trillion each. Growth ranges from −100% to +100%; horizon is a whole number from 1 to 10. Millage must stay between 0 and 1000, and collection between 0% and 100%, including all projected years. Annual reductions must remain nonnegative and cannot exceed projected gross value. Violations block results with a year-specific explanation; no silent clamping is applied. Blank optional inputs mean zero. Calculations use unrounded values.

GFOA: Financial Forecasting in the Budget Preparation Process supports transparent forecast assumptions. New York State: Property tax bills illustrates rates stated in dollars per thousand of assessed value; it is included for unit context only. No New York or other state rules are implemented.

Limitations

This is a general planning model, not a parcel tax bill calculator or a determination of lawful levy. Taxable value, assessed value, exemptions, abatements, and collection practices differ by state and jurisdiction. No statutory tax caps, rollback rates, assessment limits, equalization, reassessment cycles, exemption rules, or levy constraints are applied. Confirm definitions and permissible rates with local finance and assessment officials.

The model assumes constant annual additions and growth and additive rate, collection, and reduction changes. It omits delinquency timing, prior-year collections, refunds, appeals, tax-increment arrangements, classification ratios, and multiple taxing districts. Value reductions and cash abatements are different: enter reductions to the value base here, not cash deductions from a levy. The recurring reduction convention and assessed-value proxy may not fit local accounting or law. Future cash revenue remains conditional on the entered assumptions.